Obama: The Great Unifier?
One of the ways that Barack Obama sold himself during his campaign for president was as a unifier of a divided nation. Together with his mantra of “change,” this sounded quite hopeful and pleasing to a populace unsettled by times of increasing national hardship.
Of course, no one knew what it was that he meant by “change,” and much has been made of this fact by astute analysts. But what has not been much commented on is what Obama could possibly have meant by speaking of himself as a unifier.
Well, Richard Neuhaus, in his most recent post at the First Things blog, has brought out precisely what Obama meant by speaking of himself in such terms, particularly on the issue of abortion:
The truly ominous possibility, indeed likelihood, is that Obama does not see his extreme positions on abortion as being extreme at all. They are the entrenched orthodoxies of the parties that got him to where he is. Those in opposition are viewed as a recalcitrant minority guilty of perpetuating divisiveness, and the time has come to break their back once and for all. I hope I am wrong, but this strikes me as the more plausible understanding of the Freedom of Choice Act and other measures aimed at “bringing us together again.”
In other words, when it comes to abortion, the way that Obama proposes to end divisiveness in our land is by destorying the political and religious freedom of those who oppose him.
Of course, it is not only on the issue of abortion that our new “healer”/president promises to end divisiveness in our land. It is on the whole range of issues that pertain to the family and the Church, inasmuch as these stand in the way of hegemonic authority of the State over the individual.
Obama, the Great Unifier, has made known recently on his website his plans for advancing the “gay agenda.” Catholic News Agency reports that his website is reporting that he will, as has been predicted here on our blog, expand hate speech legislation. Furthermore, he will force increasing “anti-discrimination” laws upon employers. He will fully oppose all marriage amendment legislation that proposes to define marriage in the traditional, human, and essential meaning of the term.
All of these actions that he is proposing are opposed to religious and political freedom. They apply to Catholic institutions: priests, when the Great Unifier gets his way, will be found culpable of “hate speech” for preaching the Gospel, and Catholic institutions will be forced to employ open homosexuals.
This is the agenda of the One: whose goal is to establish peace and unity on earth by destroying his political and religious opponents.
.jpg)












































































































Can we trust the Church to stay true in such times? If not, how do we as Catholic lay people approach the coming years?
Comment by Steve — November 24, 2008 @ 7:19 AM
Steve,
The Church is the only entity that you can trust to stay true…however, do not mistake the Church for individual members…even of the hierarchy. Stay close to Rome.
Comment by David — November 24, 2008 @ 7:59 AM
I recall BO making a statement during his primary campaign that caused me considerable pause. He stated that we need as a country to move beyond the politics of divisiveness and move into the 20th century. As I recall, he specifically referred to the abortion debate as something “so 90’s” or some such thing that we need to move beyond. He mentioned that people are tired of such divisiveness. Given his radical agenda to promote abortion availability with no restrictions at the time this could mean to me only one thing…and Fr. Neuhaus has identified it. I hope that we both are wrong.
Comment by David — November 24, 2008 @ 8:06 AM
On the eve of Obama’s inauguration I am weighed down with worry. He has the ability to persuade people with his gift of speech. Many would be leaders have persuaded large number of people that they are the ones to lead them to the promised land. This night I will say a rosary for our next president.
Comment by John G. Parisi — January 19, 2009 @ 5:30 PM