Site Meter

Cosmos-Liturgy-Sex

September 13, 2007

Culture of Death Advocates and Catholic Universities

Filed under: Culture, Dissent, Faith & Reason — David @ 1:19 AM

In the news lately, has been the resurgence of speakers who variously advocate for the culture of death speaking at Catholic universities. Thomas, our American Papist, gives a rundown on an ongoing issue with Creighton University’s invitation of Ann Lamott; LifeSiteNews gives an update.

Apparently, the US Bishop’s Catholic University of America, one of my alma maters, has, after initial refusal, decided to allow John Kerry to speak at CUA. John Kerry says that he opposes abortion as an article of his Catholic faith but he does not think that he can “impose” his articles of faith on the rest of society. Thus, he gained a 100% pro-abortion rating from NARAL Pro-choice America.

LifeSite reports the justification for allowing someone with Kerry’s record, given by the CUA student leader who invited the former presidential candidate:

Mark Arnone, chairman of the College Democrats who invited Kerry to speak at CUA, defended the decision saying Kerry “expresses remarkable dedication to the doctrine and principles of Catholic social teaching established in Pope Leo XIII’s 1891 encyclical ‘Rerum Novarum’” Arnone cited Kerry advocacy “for affordable and accessible health care…minimum wage reform” and the environment. John Paul II and Pope Benedict have strongly emphasized that the life issues are of much higher priority than these other issues.

The sloppy thinking of both Kerry, Arnone, and apparently those at CUA who allowed Kerry to come, is quite evident. Kerry’s claim that abortion is murder is dogmatically certain as he suggests. However, what he fails to admit is that it is also a certainty which can be achieved through reason alone–we call this natural law. It is likewise dogmatically certain that putting innocent people to death in Nazi Germany is morally reprehensible. By Kerry’s logic, since it was legal in Nazi Germany, if he had been a German politician at the time he would have been obligated to support the “Final Solution” else he would have been guilty of “imposing” his religious faith on the rest of Germany.

One can see the fallacy of Arnone’s argument in a similar way. While it is far from given that Kerry “expresses a remarkable dedication” to Catholic social teaching, for the sake of argument let’s grant this. One still must ask what this has to do with the price of tea in China. The issue is that Kerry has unwaveringly voted for legislation which promotes the killing of the innocent unborn. Arnone’s argument is akin to defending Adolf Hitler by pointing out his remarkably effective programs which brought Germany out of a long economic depression into industrial and economic flourishing. Neither Kerry’s arguable and coincidental support of policies that accord with Rerum novarum nor Hitler’s leadership acumen excuse the formal participation, of either of them, in homicide.

LifeSite reports on a recent statement by Archbishop Burke as to the need for bishops to make it clear that personalities of Kerry’s ilk need to be publicly dealt with:

To remain silent is to permit serious confusion regarding a fundamental truth of the moral law. Confusion, of course, is one of the most insidious fruits of scandalous behavior

This situation fits this concern exactly. I do not know if Fr. David O’Connell, CUA’s president, or Archbishop Wuerl, the chancelor of CUA, will intervene but they should. It is clear that a Catholic university that represents all US Catholic bishops has the duty to uphold Catholic teaching and to avoid any actions that would scandalize the faithful. The average Catholic in the US is already confused as to the legitimacy of ignoring the Church’s teaching on abortion and events such as this do nothing to ameliorate this confusion. Unfortunately, experience has shown that if either the CUA President of Chancellor try to cancel the invitation, they will face a major revolt by the University faculty as happened in 2004 when O’Connell barred actor and abortion activist Stanley Tucci from speaking on campus. I suspect that unless the outside public pressure is sufficiently strong that Kerry will be allowed to speak.

TrackBack
Permalink


4 Comments »

  1. Oooh! I’ll have to remember that analogy– the one for the Must-Support-Holocaust, that is.

    Maybe THAT will get through….

    Comment by Foxfier — September 13, 2007 @ 4:42 AM

  2. Or we could make it clear when the annual collection for CUA pops up. That’s usually VERY effective.

    Comment by dad29 — September 13, 2007 @ 12:14 PM

  3. Hmmm…perhaps someone will be begin such a campaign and include the demand that CUA reform its faculty make up into one that if not Catholic is at least supportive of Catholic identity. Currently I would have to say that only the philosophy department reflects the image of fidelity to Ex corde that CUA pushes during its fund raising campaigns.

    Comment by Anon — September 13, 2007 @ 2:04 PM

  4. Hi. Please note that Kerry was never actually formally scheduled to come to speak at CUA, and that those higher up than USPCE were concerned about the possibility of his coming to speak. However, said higherups were unable to do anything about it until something was formally on the books.

    I wrote a short blog post about it on my blog: http://cnytr.blogspot.com/2007/09/john-kerry-and-catholic-university-of.html

    Thanks so much,

    Lauren B
    Class of 2007

    Comment by Lauren — September 26, 2007 @ 11:09 AM

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Powered by WordPress