Cosmos-Liturgy-Sex

Karen Kubby, clinic director of the Emma Goldman abortion clinic, recently marketed her abortion services as being instrumental in providing pro-life benefits for the woman and families who choose abortion. She believes that pregnant women will make a decision on whether or not to have an abortion based on their “equilibrium“. If she chooses abortion, it’s because the loss of a child would consequently result in a gain for that woman and her family. Therefore, she concludes, the decision for abortion is decidedly pro-life.

I am pro-life. I believe strongly in the value of living beings on this planet. I celebrate life in a variety of ways through my daily activities and spiritual life. I recognize the lives gained through abortion. I see the lives of women and their children who are stronger and more stable because of a decision toward abortion…. A decision about abortion is decidedly pro-life. It is a respectful and moral option….

In summary, Kubby feels the end of gaining a quality of life for women justifies the means of abortion. I mean, what woman wouldn’t want to tap into a respectful and moral means of gaining strength and stability for themselves and their children? Using her cost/benefit ratio- “equilibrium”, I wonder how far beyond the “respectful and moral option” of scrambling the brains of living children outside of the womb would she be willing to go? To what extent does she really covet the authority and ultimate power given to women, which exceeds that of any man, as sole judge and executioner over another human being?

Source - Prolife Blogs