Cosmos-Liturgy-Sex

Dr. Phillip Blosser of the Pertinacious Papist has a gadfly visiting his blog who sadly is an priest. I say sadly because this poor confused soul appears to be obsessed with homosexual sex and attempting to justify it based upon some illusionary ideal. Where does he find this “ideal”? Ostensibly from talking to those with SSA who succumb to their temptations, about their experiences. It seems to me that if you talk to anyone with an affective disorder and assume that they can objectively describe the impacts of their disordered experiences on their emotional health, then you are quite naive.

Any way, Dr. Blosser recently responded to Fr. O’Leary’s musings that the connection between the structure and purpose of the body and any deeper meaning was “biologism.” Biologism was a term coined by another confused priest, Fr. Charlie Curran, to argue that morality cannot be derived from biological structures. This position suffers from a Cartesian dualism which considers the soul and body to be antithetical to one another. It is not surprising that Fr. O’Leary would try to resort to such a defective anthropology in trying to justify disorder because one needs some way to justify ignoring common sense.

Any way, Dr. Blosser provides an excellent summary showing why anal sex is unnatural and dangerous, and in fact that the entire SSA lifestyle, in general, is unnatural and dangerous. He focuses on the biological implications. What is Fr. O’Leary’s response? Hate speech. Well of course. If there is no logical argument against the facts I suppose one must resort to playing the “victim” card.

Go read the post, but be advised that it is necessarily somewhat graphic and so it is also repulsive.