Cosmos-Liturgy-Sex

LifeSiteNews has an article describing the disgusting demand of a same-sex intercourse activist group to lower the legal age for anal sex in Canada from 18 to 16. Why? Equal rights of course. The age for consensual vaginal sex is now 14 but the conservative government is trying to increase the age to 16. The age for consensual anal sex is 18. So the same-sex activist figure, hey…we want to be able to accost 16 year old boys without legal consequences. In fact, attempting to “recruit” underage boys is a well established past-time in this subculture. They call themselves chicken-hawks.

Let’s leave the aside for now the disorder of same-sex attraction and anal sex themselves for now. We will also not consider the developmental immaturity of children, especially sexual maturity, at this point in their development. Just from a purely medical point of view, is there an equivalence between vaginal sex and anal sex. No! The LifeSiteNews article summarizes:

Experts on sexual behaviour, or “sexperts” at the site refers to them, warn that anal sex is the most dangerous behaviour for transmission of HIV/AIDS and all other STDs since the anus is not designed for sexual activity as is the vagina. Moreover, the ’sexperts’ warn that the practice also leads to fecal incontinence - loss of normal control of the sphincter muscles which leads to stool leaking from the rectum at unexpected times.

As the website puts it: “Even when people use lots of lubrication during anal sex, there can be tearing of the tissue inside the anus . . . For this reason, anal sex is the riskiest form of sexual activity when it comes to the transmission of HIV/AIDS. “Tiny tears in the anal tissue are like giant superhighways for the HIV viruses, allowing them to get inside the body and enter the blood system. Anal tears provide an opening for all the other STDs as well.

“It may be possible for repetitive anal sex to lead to weakening of the anal sphincter, which is the muscle that tightens after we defecate. Once weakened, feces can escape the anus against our will.”

…Jessica White West Vancouver, B.C. wrote a letter to the editor of the National Post…: “If both vaginal and anal intercourse were in accordance with natural law and did not discriminate in terms of consequences, this would be true. However, this is not the case with homosexual sex, as two people of the same sex do not have the required body parts to interact sexually and their intercourse can never be fruitful.”

White continued, “Furthermore, their sexual practices result in both physical and emotional damage, as is evidenced in numerous studies. More than 80% of AIDS cases in Canada are among homosexual or bisexual males; other diseases suffered either exclusively, or in larger percentages by the homosexual population, include: anal cancer, chlamydia trachomatis, cryptosporidium, giardia lamblia, herpes simplex virus, HPV, gonorrhea, viral hepatitis B and C, and syphilis.”

It is remarkable the “scientific” evidence that can be ignored in the face of political correctness, especially by the same MSM and others who will take every opportunity to flout “science” when it serves their purposes. I wonder what the activist groups who are so vocal in their efforts to “protect” children from the Church would have to say about the Canadian legal campaign to remove these legal protections from children who can easily be confused by adult predators?